VARCCritical Reasoning
Critical Reasoning: Logical Analysis
Question Types
Strengthen/Weaken
- Identify conclusion and premises
- Find option that adds/removes support
- Don't bring external knowledge
Assumption
- What must be true for conclusion to follow?
- Use negation test: If assumption false, does argument fall apart?
Inference
- Must be definitely true based on passage
- Avoid extreme conclusions
- Don't add information
Paradox/Explain
- Find option that resolves apparent contradiction
- Look for missing link
Common Logical Fallacies
Hasty Generalization
Concluding from insufficient sample
False Cause
Assuming correlation implies causation
Circular Reasoning
Conclusion restates premise
Appeal to Authority
Argument based on who said it, not what was said
Straw Man
Misrepresenting opponent's argument
Argument Structure
Standard Form
1. Premise 1
2. Premise 2
3. Therefore, Conclusion
Identify
- Conclusion indicators: Therefore, Thus, Hence, So
- Premise indicators: Because, Since, Given that, As
CAT Strategy
- Separate facts from opinions
- Identify conclusion first
- Map logical flow
- Eliminate extreme options
- Time limit: 2 minutes per question